Between the mid-1960s and the 1980s, military dictatorships dominated South America, epitomized by the ABC countries: Argentina from 1966 to 1971 and 1976 to 1983, Brazil from 1964 to 1985, and Chile from 1973 to 1990. Three historians of Latin America ask what, if anything, military rule in these three countries reveals about the current lurch toward authoritarianism in the United States.
These remarks, presented at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association, may be read as a primer on the different strains of authoritarianism then and now, there and here.
Across the comparisons, three aspects stand out. To start, the fearful rhetoric of combating internal enemies, common to South America’s military dictatorships, has been echoed by Trump administration officials at the highest levels. Contrasts, however, loom larger, in everything from the current administration’s source of legitimacy (elections, as opposed to military coups), to its personalistic style, to its relative ability to wield untrammeled power. Finally, the South American cases remind us that people resisted authoritarianism under far more perilous conditions than anything people in the United States have faced to this point. We are going to need more opposition to stem the rising authoritarian tide.
There are four ways in which MAGA authoritarianism echoes the Argentine dictatorships of the Cold War era, and especially the horrific regime installed in 1976.
The first echo is the notion of internal enemies. Argentina’s Cold War regimes were buoyed by the National Security Doctrine, which justified repression against perceived domestic enemies. This justification was made most infamously by the military governor of Buenos Aires province in 1977, when he declared, “First we kill all the subversives; then, their collaborators; later, their sympathizers; afterward, those who remain indifferent; and finally, the undecided.” In Argentina, the dictatorship identified an ever…
Auteur: Jennifer Adair
