An Undemocratic Union Was Key to César Chávez’s Sexual Abuse

Frank Bardacke

For the men we know about, it comes from money or political connections or celebrity. Where did César’s power come from?

The first answer is that he had just turned a losing 1965 grape strike into the most successful boycott in American history, at the conclusion of which, in 1970, farmworkers won the most substantial contracts they’d ever had: a hiring hall, grievance procedures, seniority lists. They’d never had those before.

That’s the first reason he had power. Through that he became a celebrity. He was the organizer, the architect, and the main energy behind that boycott, a hero and a celebrity with the kind of immunity that modern celebrities have.

But the second reason was an internal reason within the UFW. Everybody within the organization owed their job to César. He appointed everybody, he could discharge anybody at his will, which he often did. That wasn’t just theoretical power; periodic purges pulsed through the organization. So you didn’t disagree with César except at the peril of losing your job.

Those were the two reasons that no one wanted to follow up on the rumors of abuse. He was an authentic hero who had led and directed that boycott, and everybody in his organization owed their job to him.

La suite est à lire sur: jacobin.com
Auteur: Frank Bardacke

Pour l’actu indépendante

🌍 Soutenez l’info libre. Gardez OnePlanète vivant et sans pub
→ ko-fi.com/oneplanetecom

Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com