The vast majority of National Labor Relations Board representation elections are for pretty small units: between 2020 and 2023, almost 90 percent of them were for units of one hundred workers or less. All workers should be in unions; unionized work is, on average, much better than nonunionized work, period. But from a macro perspective, such small elections aren’t going to do much to move the needle in terms of reversing the downward union density trend.
Large-unit labor elections, which I’ll take here to be any representation elections involving 250 or more workers, comprise a very small percentage of NLRB elections: in FY 2024, such elections comprised 4.4 percent of all NLRB representation elections, but they involved 48 percent of all eligible voters that year. By contrast, 88 percent involved one hundred workers or less, but these made up only 34 percent of all eligible voters.
There’s a good argument to be made, then, that overall trends in new union membership can be derived from an analysis of the small number of large-unit elections, given how consequential these elections are in terms of the numbers. This is what I’m going to aim to do here and in future monthly roundups: look at the results of all NLRB representation elections involving 250 or more eligible voters.
For those elections tallied in January, twelve involved 250 or more workers, and ten were successful, involving the unionization of 5,628 workers. One was the much-discussed unionization of 297 Whole Foods workers in Philadelphia. The rest were all in health care, and a whopping six were run and won by Service Employees International Union’s (SEIU) Committee of Interns and Residents (CIR). In one month, CIR gained 3,862 new members.
CIR has doubled in size since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, now 37,000 strong. CIR president Taylor Walker believes that the…
Auteur: Benjamin Y. Fong
