A wave of revolutionary optimism swept across Europe after World War I, as Communists and the independent revolutionary left forged a new radical political identity by separating themselves from social democracy. Yet in the years that followed, this initial revolutionary enthusiasm was replaced by a series of devastating defeats and retreats. The deep and seemingly permanent divisions of the international left persisted, leaving it weak and fragmented when fascism came to power in Italy in 1922 and in Germany in 1933.
A widespread longing for left-wing unity soon began to emerge among both Communists and social democrats. Yet, it was only in the mid-1930s that a new vision and strategy of such unity was officially introduced: the so-called Popular Front, inaugurated by the Communist International (Comintern), and most famously practiced in France, Spain, and Chile. The Popular Front proved crucial in establishing bulwarks against fascism’s further rise. However, its left-wing components failed to advance their long-term goal of socialism.
But with the far right again on the rise, what can the contemporary left learn from the Popular Front’s ambivalent legacy?
The concept of the Popular Front was deeply embedded in French politics of the interwar period. Its immediate origins can be traced to the events of February 6, 1934, when the far-right Croix-de-Feu (“Cross of Fire”) staged a protest march through Paris that ended in violent clashes and uncontrolled rioting. France suddenly appeared to be on the verge of a fascist coup, and the need to defend the democratic republic grew acute. A major anti-fascist rally followed on February 13 in Paris, where rank-and-file Socialists and Communists spontaneously joined forces. The pressure from below was formidable as demands for united action against the fascist threat grew adamant.
The Communists had issued calls for “united fronts” (i.e., common activity between social democrats and other socialists) for…
Auteur: Kasper Braskén
